JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)November 30, 2006

A- de 2006

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Manuel José Cepeda Espinosa

✓Claimant Ati Quigua Izquierdo

✓
Topic · hard data
Solicitud Para Dejar Sin Efectos La Sentencia Del Consejo De Estado Que Confirma La Decision De Instancia Revisada Mediante Sentencia T-778/05 Que Amparo Los Derechos De Ati Quigua Izquierdo. La Corte Constitucional Seria Competente Para Proferir Un Fallo Definitivo Solo En Sede De Revision De La Correspondiente Sentencia De Tutela Sobre La Providencia Del Consejo De Estado
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Corte Constitucional
  • Mientras no se presente nueva acción de tutela contra decisión del Consejo de Estado no puede emitir pronunciamiento definitivo
Accion De Tutela De Concejal De Bogota Perteneciente A Resguardo Indigena Arhuaco
  • Competencia de la Corte Constitucional solo en sede de revisión para proferir fallo definitivo sobre providencia del Consejo de Estado
2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. RESUELVE
  2. Primero. INFORMAR a Ati Quigua Izquierdo que la Corte Constitucional sería competente para proferir un fallo definitivo solo en sede de revisión de la correspondiente sentencia de tutela sobre la providencia del Consejo de Estado de la referencia.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.